酒精依赖与高血压患者血压控制的关系
Correlation between alcohol dependence and blood pressure control in patients with hypertension
-
摘要: 目的探讨徐州市高血压患者的酒精依赖与血压控制的关系。方法 2013年4-6月采用多阶段分层整群随机抽样方法抽取徐州市规律接受治疗的原发性高血压患者,酒精依赖程度采用密西根酒精依赖调查表(MAST)评定,其他因素由自行设计的问卷进行调查。将高血压患者分为3组,不饮酒组、饮酒无依赖组和酒精依赖组,酒精依赖组又继续分为低度依赖组、轻度依赖组和中度及以上依赖组。结果共调查高血压患者4405例,收缩压均值为(143.0±16.8)mm Hg,舒张压均值为(88.0±10.9)mm Hg,饮酒率16.5%(95%CI15.4%17.6%),酒精依赖率13.8%(95%CI12.8%14.9%),血压控制者1259例,控制率28.6%(95%CI27.3%29.9%)。饮酒但无依赖患者血压控制率最高为40.7%;不饮酒组血压控制率为28.6%;酒精依赖组控制率为25.9%(χ2=10.67,P<0.01);在依赖组,不同依赖程度之间血压控制率差异无统计学意义(χ2=0.06,P=0.97)。以不饮酒作为参照,Logistic回归分析显示:随着酒精依赖程度的加重,OR值逐渐增大:酒精无依赖(OR=0.59,95%CI 0.40~0.85,P<0.01);低度依赖(OR=1.90,95%CI1.17~3.09,P<0.01);轻度依赖(OR=1.99,95%CI 1.27~3.13,P<0.01);中度及以上依赖(OR=2.00,95%CI 1.17~3.41,P<0.01);在调整年龄、体质量指数、文化程度、体育锻炼、收入水平等因素后,酒精依赖仍然是血压控制的不利因素:酒精无依赖(OR=0.59,95%CI 0.41~0.86,P<0.01);低度依赖(OR=1.89,95%CI 1.16~3.09,P<0.01);轻度依赖(OR=1.96,95%CI 1.25~3.10,P<0.01);中度及以上依赖(OR=1.98,95%CI1.15~3.39,P<0.01)。结论饮酒无依赖有利于高血压患者的血压控制,酒精依赖不利于高血压患者的血压控制。Abstract: Objective To explore the relationship between alcohol dependence and blood pressure control in patients with hypertension in Xuzhou. Methods Essential hypertensive patients with regular treatment were extracted by multi-stage stratified cluster random sampling method between April to June 2013 in Xuzhou. The degree of alcohol dependence was measured with Michigan alcoholism screening test(MAST),and other factors were investigated by self-designed questionnaire. The participants were divided into three groups,which was teetotal group,non-alcohol-dependent group and alcohol-dependent group. And the alcohol-dependent group was subdivided into low,mild,moderate and above degree subgroup.Results A total of 4405 hypertensive patients were included. The mean systolic blood pressure and diastolic blood pressure were(143.0±16.8)and(88.0±10.9)mm Hg,respectively. The drinking rate was 16.5%(95% CI15.4%-17.6%),and the rate of alcohol dependence was 13.8%(95% CI12.8%-14.9%). A total of 1259 patients had their blood pressure controlled,and the rate of blood pressure control was 28.6%(95% CI 27.3%-29.9%). Non-alcohol-dependent group had the highest rate of blood pressure control(40.7%),and alcohol-dependent group had the lowest rate of blood pressure control(25.9%),while the rate of blood pressure control in teetotal group was 28.6%(χ~2=10.67,P<0.01). There were no statistically significant differences in the rate of blood pressure control among the subgroups with different degree of alcohol dependence(χ~2=0.06,P=0.97). Compared to the teetotal group,Logistic regression analysis showed that the OR was increased with increase in the degree of alcohol dependencepatients with non-alcohol-dependence(OR=0.59,95% CI0.40-0.85,P<0.01),low dependence(OR=1.90,95% CI1.17-3.09,P<0.01),mild dependence(OR=1.99,95% CI 1.27-3.13,P<0.01),moderate and above dependence(OR=2.00,95% CI1.17-3.41,P<0.01). After adjusting for confounding factors,such as age,body mass index,education level,physical exercise and income level,alcohol dependence was still an adverse factor for blood pressure controlnon-alcohol-dependence(OR=0.59,95% CI0.41-0.86,P<0.01),low dependence(OR=1.89,95% CI1.16-3.09,P<0.01),mild dependence(OR=1.96,95% CI1.25-3.10,P<0.01),moderate and above dependence(OR=1.98,95% CI1.15-3.39,P<0.01). Conclusion Alcohol independence is good for blood pressure control,while alcohol dependence is bad for blood pressure control in patients with hypertension.