血管紧张素转换酶抑制药和血管紧张素受体阻滞药治疗对合并高血压的新型冠状病毒肺炎患者住院转归的影响

Effect of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor and angiotensin receptor blocker on the outcome of hospitalization of patients with hypertension and novel coronavirus pneumonia

  • 摘要: 目的观察血管紧张素转换酶抑制药(ACEI)和血管紧张素受体阻滞药(ARB)治疗对合并高血压的新型冠状病毒肺炎(新冠肺炎)患者住院转归的影响。方法 2020年2月12日至3月30日,入选武汉雷神山医院住院治疗的新冠肺炎患者202例,对其中合并高血压的患者67例(33.2%)进行回顾性分析。根据是否服用和停用ACEI或ARB分为使用组(n=22)、停用组(n=24)和未用组(n=21)。记录各组患者新冠肺炎相关药物和降压药使用情况、氧气治疗情况、血压控制水平等治疗性指标;平均住院天数、住院死亡率、住院期间病情恶化级别、痊愈出院率等住院转归指标;以及部分血清生化指标如丙氨酸氨基转移酶(ALT)、乳酸脱氢酶(LDH)、肌酐、肌酸激酶等的变化,并进行比较分析。结果入院时,三组患者年龄、性别、血压水平、基础疾病、严重程度(普通型、重型和危重型比例)、血清生化指标(ALT、LDH、肌酐、肌酸激酶水平)等差异无统计学意义(均P>0.05);住院期间,三组患者的新冠肺炎相关主要治疗药物使用比例、氧气治疗方式、住院死亡率、痊愈出院率、病情恶化级别、咽拭子核酸转阴天数比较,差异无统计学意义(均P>0.05)。与使用组比较,停用组和未用组钙通道阻滞剂的使用比例高(95.8%、85.7%比40.9%,均P<0.01),出院时三组患者的血压水平和达标率差异无统计学意义(均P>0.05);与使用组比较,停用组和未用组住院天数较长(30.04±8.82)、(30.09±9.25)比(27.41±6.43)d,但差异亦无统计学意义(均P>0.05)。与入院时比较,住院期间三组患者的血清ALT、LDH、肌酐、肌酸激酶水平差异无统计学意义(均P>0.05)。结论对合并高血压的新冠肺炎患者,ACEI或ARB的使用与否对其住院转归无明显影响。

     

    Abstract: Objective To observe the effect of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor(ACEI) and angiotensin receptor blocker(ARB) on the outcome of hospitalization in patients with hypertension and novel coronavirus pneumonia(NCP). Methods Retrospective analysis was performed. In 202 NCP patients who were hospitalized in Thunder-God hospital, Wuhan from February 12, 2020 to March 30, 2020, 67(33.0%) complicated with hypertension. According to whether taking ACEI or ARB, 67 patients were divided into 3 groups. Patients who received ACEI or ARB during treatment were included in group A(n=22). Patients who received ACEI or ARB before admission but interrupted ACEI or ARB after admission were included in group B(n=24). Patients who were not treated with ACEI or ARB before and after admission were included in group C(n=21). Therapeutic indicators such as the use of antiviral drugs, anti-hypertensive drugs, oxygen therapy, blood pressure control levels and hospitalization outcomes such as average days of hospitalization, hospitalization mortality rate, grade of deterioration during hospitalization, and some serum biochemical indicators such as alanine aminotransferase(ALT), lactate dehydrogenase(LDH), creatinine(Cr) and creatine kinase(CK) were recorded. The changes of these indicators in the three groups of patients and their application relationship with ACEI/ARB were compared and analyzed. Results There was no significant difference in age, gender, blood pressure level, underlying disease, severity(common type, ratio of severe to critical), and serum biochemical indicators(ALT, LDH, creatinine, creatine kinase levels) at admission among three groups(all P>0.05). During the hospitalization, there were no statistically significant differences in the proportion of NCP-related medication use, oxygen therapy, hospital mortality, recovery and discharge rate, the degree of deterioration during hospitalization and the days of throat swab nucleic acid turning negative among three groups(all P>0.05). Compared with the group A, the proportion of calcium channel blocker in the group B and the group C was higher(95.8%, 85.7% vs 40.9%, P<0.01), but there was no significant difference in blood pressure levels and compliance rates at discharge(P>0.05). Compared with the group A, the hospitalization period of the group B and the group C was longer (30.04±8.82),(30.09±9.25) vs(27.41±6.43) d, but the difference was not statistical significance(all P>0.05). Compared with admission, there was no statistically significant difference in serum ALT, LDH, creatinine and creatine kinase levels among the three groups during hospitalization(all P>0.05). Conclusion ACEI or ARB has no significant effect on the outcome of hospitalization in patients with hypertension and NCP.

     

/

返回文章
返回