臂间收缩压差联合臂踝指数筛查锁骨下动脉狭窄的价值

Adding brachial-ankle index to inter-arm systolic blood pressure difference for screening subclavian artery stenosis

  • 摘要: 目的 评价臂间收缩压差(IASBPD)联合臂踝指数(BAI)筛查锁骨下动脉狭窄的价值。方法 入选2017年10月至2018年10月在阜外医院行选择性弓上动脉造影,并于造影前5 d内完成同步四肢血压测量的所有患者,收集临床资料。由不知晓患者资料的研究者阅读锁骨下动脉造影结果,诊断金标准采用直径狭窄≥50%。应用受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线分析IASBPD和BAI的最佳诊断切点,评估二者联合诊断价值。结果 共入选317例患者(634条锁骨下动脉),男性246例,占77.6%,年龄39~84(64.2±8.5)岁。患者133例锁骨下动脉直径狭窄≥50%,其中单侧狭窄100例,占75.2%,双侧狭窄33例,占24.8%。IASBPD和BAI的ROC曲线下面积分别为0.83(95%CI 0.79~0.88,P<0.001)和0.65(95%CI 0.60~0.71,P<0.001),最佳诊断切点分别为9 mm Hg和0.8。诊断锁骨下动脉狭窄,IASBPD≥9 mm Hg的敏感度为57.1%,特异度为94.0%,阳性预测值为87.4%,阴性预测值为75.2%;BAI≤0.8的敏感度为48.1%,特异度为86.4%,阳性预测值为71.9%,阴性预测值为69.7%。IASBPD联合BAI较二者单独诊断的敏感度增高至68.4%,特异度稍降低至82.6%。结论 IASBPD联合BAI可提高筛查锁骨下动脉狭窄的敏感度。

     

    Abstract: Objective To investigate the efficiency of inter-arm systolic blood pressure difference(IASBPD) combined with brachial-ankle index(BAI) for screening subclavian stenosis. Methods We retrospectively enrolled all hospitalized patients who underwent supra-arch artery angiography and had done simultaneous four-limb blood pressure measurements within 5 days before angiography from October 2017 to October 2018 at Fuwai hospital. The gold standard of subclavian stenosis was defined as 50% or more diameter stenosis identified on angiography by blind method. The receiver operating characteristic(ROC) curve was used to calculate the optimal cut-off values of IASBPD and BAI. The efficiency of IASBPD combined with BAI for screening stenosis was further investigated. Results Three hundred and seventeen patients(634 subclavian arteries) were consecutively enrolled. In them, 246(77.6%) were male, with a mean age of(64.2±8.5) years. One hundred and thirty-three patients had stenosis ≥50%, and 33(24.8%) were bilateral. The optimal cut-off points of IASBPD and BAI for diagnosing stenosis≥50% were 9 mm Hg and 0.8, with the area under the ROC curve of 0.83(95%CI 0.79-0.88, P<0.001) and 0.65(95%CI 0.60-0.71, P<0.001), respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of IASBPD were 57.1%, 94.0%, 87.4% and 75.2%, respectively; that of BAI were 48.1%,86.4%, 71.9% and 69.7%, respectively. IASBPD combined with BAI significantly improved the sensitivity to 68.4%, while the specificity decreased to 82.6% compared with IASBPD or BAI alone. Conclusion IASBPD combined with BAI achieved greater sensitivity for screening subclavian stenosis.

     

/

返回文章
返回