不同界值诊断的单纯舒张期高血压与颈动脉内膜中层厚度的关系

Association of isolated diastolic hypertension based on different cutoff values with the carotid intima-media thickness

  • 摘要: 目的 探讨不同界值诊断的单纯舒张期高血压(IDH)与颈动脉内膜中层厚度(CIMT)的关系。方法 以开滦研究队列中参加2010年体检及后续随访,且接受了颈动脉超声检查者23 622人作为观察对象。分别参照我国高血压防治指南和2017年美国心脏病学会(ACC)/美国心脏协会(AHA)高血压管理指南标准将研究对象分为4组:正常血压组、IDH组、单纯收缩期高血压(ISH)组和收缩舒张期高血压(SDH)组。采用多因素logistic回归分析总人群和不同年龄段不同标准IDH对CIMT的影响。结果 最终入选研究对象21 649人。按照中国高血压防治指南和2017年ACC/AHA高血压管理指南标准,IDH组人群分别为938例(4.3%)和2 815例(13.0%),IDH组CIMT增厚人群分别为202例(21.5%)和410例(14.6%)。以CIMT是否增厚为因变量,分别以两种标准定义的高血压分组为自变量代入多因素logistic回归模型,在校正了多种混杂因素后,结果显示,两种标准诊断的IDH均与CIMT增厚不相关(P>0.05)。分层分析显示,我国高血压防治指南标准诊断的IDH是年龄<45岁组CIMT增厚的相关因素(OR=1.623,95%CI 1.005~2.622)。结论 不同界值诊断的IDH患者CIMT值及异常检出率有差异。IDH与CIMT增厚不相关。应加强年轻人群中IDH个体的干预。

     

    Abstract: Objective To investigate the correlation of isolated diastolic hypertension(IDH) based on different cutoff values with the carotid intima-media thickness(CIMT). Methods A total of 23 622 patients from the Kailuan study cohort who underwent carotid ultrasound in 2010 and participated in the subsequent follow-up were observed. The subjects were divided into four groups according to the diagnostic criteria of Chinese guidelines for the prevention and treatment of hypertension(Chinese standard) or 2017 American College of Cardiology(ACC)/American Heart Association(AHA) guidelines for the management of hypertension(ACC/AHA standard):normal blood pressure group, IDH group, isolated systolic hypertension(ISH) group and systolic-diastolic hypertension(SDH) group. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to analyze the influence of IDH on CIMT under different hypertension standards and in different age groups. Results There were 21 649 subjects met the inclusion criteria. According to the China standards and 2017 ACC/AHA standards, 938(4.3%) and 2 815(13.0%) subjects were diagnosed with IDH, including 202(21.5%) and 410(14.6%) patients with thickened CIMT, respectively. Taking the thickening of CIMT as the dependent variable, IDH as the independent variable, after correcting for multiple confounding factors, the multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that neither IDH diagnosed by Chinese standard nor ACC/AHA standard was associated with CIMT thickening(P>0.05). While in subjects under 45 years, IDH was the correlative factor for CIMT thickening(OR=1.623, 95%CI 1.005-2.622). Conclusions The value and abnormal detection rate of CIMT are different in IDH patients diagnosed by different cutoff values. IDH is not associated with CIMT thickening. IDH should be mainly intervened in young people.

     

/

返回文章
返回