心房颤动抗凝治疗策略变化的单中心回顾性分析

The change of anticoagulant therapy in atrial fibrillation: a single-center retrospective study

  • 摘要: 目的 回顾性分析2013—2020年非瓣膜性心房颤动(NVAF)住院患者抗凝策略的变化情况。方法 入选2013年1月至2020年12月从福建医科大学附属第一医院出院的NVAF患者4 135例,每2年为一个时间段分组,把患者分为4组进行分析(2013—2014年组1 047例,2015—2016年组1 036例,2017—2018年组1 042例,2019—2020年组1 010例)。以非瓣膜病性心房颤动脑卒中危险的评分(CHA2DS2-VASc)、心房颤动抗凝治疗出血评分系统(HAS-BLED)作为危险分层依据,分析NVAF患者抗凝治疗率,以及华法林与新型口服抗凝药(NOACs)使用情况。结果 脑卒中高危患者(CHA2DS2-VASc评分≥2分男性,≥3女性患者),2013—2014、2015—2016、2017—2018、2019—2020年组抗凝比例分别为30.23%、38.04%、62.69%和76.67%,抗凝比例随时间推移而增加(χ■=392.549,P<0.001)。在HAS-BLED评分≤2分患者中,2013—2014、2015—2016、2017—2018、2019—2020年组的抗凝比例分别为33.70%、41.09%、62.19%和65.73%;HAS-BLED评分≥3分患者,各组抗凝比例分别为20.00%、30.23%、40.54%和75.29%。高危和低危出血患者抗凝比例都随时间推移而增加。2013—2014、2015—2016、2017—2018、2019—2020年组采用华法林抗凝的比例分别为33.05%、36.97%、15.36%和4.16%,采用NOACs抗凝的比例分别为0、3.67%、46.07%和62.38%。服用华法林的患者国际标准化比值(INR)在治疗目标范围内(2~3)的时间百分比(TTR)中位数为38.0%(20.0%,50.0%),TTR在65%以上的患者只有11.55%。结论 NVAF患者的抗凝比例随时间推移逐渐增加,但与指南建议有一定的差距;服用华法林患者门诊监测INR的达标率低;服用华法林抗凝治疗率在下降,NOACs已经开始部分替代华法林抗凝治疗。

     

    Abstract: Objective To retrospectively analyze the change of anticoagulant therapy in hospitalized patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation(NVAF) from 2013 to 2020. Methods Four thousand one hundred and thirty-five patients with NVAF discharged from the First Hospital of Fujian Medical University from January 2013 to December 2020 were enrolled, and the patients were divided into 4 groups according to the time period of every 2 years(1 047 patients in the 2013-2014 group, 1 036 patients in the 2015-2016 group, 1 042 patients in the 2017-2018 group, and 1 010 patients in the 2019-2020 group). The CHA2DS2-VASc congestive heart failure, hypertension, age≥75(doubled), diabetes mellitus, stroke(doubled), vascular disease, age 65-74 and sex category(female) score and HAS-BLED(hypertension, abnormal renal/liver function, stroke, bleeding history or predisposition, labile international normalized ratio, elderly, drugs/alcohol concomitantly) score were involved in the risk stratification. The rates of anticoagulation, warfarin and new oral anticoagulants(NOACs) use in each group were analyzed. Results In patients at high risk of stroke(men with CHA2DS2-VASc score ≥2 and women with CHA2DS2-VASc score ≥3), the rates of anticoagulation use were 30.23%, 38.04%, 62.69%, and 76.67% respectively in the year of 2013-2014, 2015-2016, 2017-2018, 2019-2020, showing an increasing trend over time(χ■=392.549, P<0.001). The rates of anticoagulation use in the year of 2013-2014, 2015-2016, 2017-2018, 2019-2020 were 33.70%, 41.09%, 62.19%, and 65.73%, respectively in patients with HAS-BLED score of ≤2, and which were 20.00%, 30.23%, 40.54% and 75.29% respectively in patients with HAS-BLED score of ≥3. The rates of anticoagulation use showed an increasing trend over time in patients with high and low risk of bleeding. The proportions of using warfarin for anticoagulation in 2013-2014, 2015-2016, 2017-2018, 2019-2020 were 33.05%, 36.97%, 15.36%, and 4.16%, respectively, and the proportions of using NOACs for anticoagulation were 0, 3.67%, 46.07%, and 62.38%, respectively. The median time in target range(TTR) for international normalized ratio(INR)(target: 2-3) in patients taking warfarin was 38.0%(20.0%, 50.0%), and only 11.55% of patients had a TTR of 65% or more. Conclusions The rate of anticoagulation therapy for patients with high risk of stroke has increased over time, but falls short of guideline recommendations. The control rate of INR is low in out-patient taking warfarin. The use of warfarin is declining, and NOACs have begun to partially replace warfarin in anticoagulat therapy.

     

/

返回文章
返回