“高血压达标中心”管理模式对高血压患者的管理效果

Effects of “Hypertension Center” model on health management in patients with hypertension

  • 摘要:
    目的 探讨“高血压达标中心”管理模式对高血压患者血压控制水平、成本和健康管理效果的影响。
    方法  本研究为随机对照研究,选取2023年6—12月就诊于佛山复星禅诚医院下属四家卫星医院的高血压患者4 000例作为观察对象,采用随机数字表分为对照组和干预组,其中对照组2 000例采用常规高血压慢性病管理模式进行管理,干预组2 000例采用“高血压达标中心”管理模式进行管理。干预6个月后,比较两组干预前后的血压、生活方式、自我管理能力变化及降压药费用,最后采用回归分析探讨患者血压由不达标转为达标的相关影响因素。
    结果 干预6个月后,干预组和对照组分别有1 840例和1 826例成功完成随访。干预前干预组和对照组的收缩压(140.83±7.74)比(140.76±7.70)mmHg,t=−0.254,P=0.799和舒张压(89.05±6.42)比(88.74±6.57)mmHg,t=−1.474,P=0.141差异无统计学意义;干预后,干预组的收缩压(130.78±7.43)比(135.84±8.88)mmHg,t=18.682,P<0.001和舒张压(83.86±6.57)比(85.81±6.60)mmHg,t=8.972,P<0.001低于对照组。干预后,干预组血压达标率高于对照组(76.25%比63.58%,χ2=69.961,P<0.001)。干预后,干预组降压药种类少于对照组(Z=−7.026,P<0.001)。干预组干预结束后3个月内月平均降压药费用低于对照组70.00(59.24, 116.20)比89.35(59.43, 125.28)元,Z=−6.520,P<0.001。干预后干预组和对照组在控制吸烟率(89.43%比78.83%,χ2=20.240,P<0.001)、控制饮酒率(91.79%比80.93%,χ2=27.306,P<0.001)、运动习惯改善率(50.11%比37.40%,χ2=60.100,P<0.001)、摄盐改善率(74.34%比57.07%,χ2=87.652,P<0.001)、服药依从性改善率(77.09%比59.89%,χ2=74.817,P<0.001)及遵医行为改善率(82.77%比63.08%,χ2=141.702,P<0.001)方面比较,差异均有统计学意义。干预期间干预组患者的健康教育活动参与率高于对照组(Z=−7.695,P<0.001)。多因素logistic回归分析结果表明,控制吸烟(OR=0.578,95%CI 0.378~0.884)、控制饮酒(OR=0.662,95%CI 0.444~0.987)、运动习惯改善(OR=0.811,95%CI 0.671~0.981)、摄盐改善(OR=0.751,95%CI 0.607~0.928)、服药依从性改善(OR=0.275,95%CI 0.219~0.345)、遵医行为改善(OR=0.714,95%CI 0.560~0.911)是高血压患者血压由不达标转为达标的保护因素。
    结论 经过“高血压达标中心”管理模式管理后,高血压患者能够获得更好的血压控制效果,耗费成本更低,健康管理水平更好。

     

    Abstract:
    Objective To investigate the impact of the “Hypertension Center” management model on the blood pressure control level, costs and health management in hypertensive patients.
    Methods A randomized controlled trial was conducted. A total of 4 000 hypertensive patients who visited four satellite hospitals affiliated to Foshan Fosun Chancheng Hospital from June 2023 to December 2023 were selected and were randomly divided into control group and intervention group using a random number table. In the control group, 2 000 cases were managed by routine hypertension management mode, while in the intervention group, 2 000 cases were managed by "Hypertension Center" management mode. After 6 months of intervention, the changes in blood pressure, lifestyle, self-management ability, and cost of antihypertensive drugs between the two groups were compared. Finally, regression analysis was used to explore the relevant influencing factors of blood pressure transition from uncontrolled to controlled.
    Results Six months later, 1 840 cases in the intervention group and 1 826 cases in the control group successfully completed follow-up. There was no significant difference in systolic blood pressure (140.83±7.74) vs (140.76±7.70) mmHg, t=−0.254, P=0.799 and diastolic blood pressure (89.05±6.42) vs (88.74±6.57) mmHg, t=−1.474, P=0.141 between intervention group and control group before intervention. After intervention, the systolic blood pressure (130.78±7.43) vs (135.84±8.88) mmHg, t=18.682, P<0.001 and the diastolic blood pressure (83.86±6.57) vs (85.81±6.60) mmHg, t=8.972, P<0.001 were lower in the intervention group than those in the control group. The blood pressure control rate in the intervention group was higher than that in the control group (76.25% vs 63.58%, χ2=69.961, P<0.001) after intervention. The types of antihypertensive drugs in the intervention group were fewer than those in the control group after intervention (Z=−7.026, P<0.001). The average monthly cost of antihypertensive drugs in the intervention group within 3 months after intervention was less than that in the control group 70.00 (59.24, 116.20) vs 89.35 (59.43, 125.28) Yuan, Z=−6.520, P<0.001. There was statistically significant differences in the smoking control rate (89.43% vs 78.83%, χ2=20.240, P<0.001), drinking control rate (91.79% vs 80.93%, χ2=27.306, P<0.001), exercise habits improvement rate (50.11% vs 37.40%, χ2=60.100, P<0.001), salt intake improvement rate (74.34% vs 57.07%, χ2=87.652, P<0.001), medication adherence improvement rate (77.09% vs 59.89%, χ2=74.817, P<0.001) and medical compliance behavior improvement rate (82.77% vs 63.08%, χ2=141.702, P<0.001) between the intervention group and the control group after intervention. During the intervention period, the proportion of patients participating in health education activities in the intervention group was higher than that in control group (Z=−7.695, P<0.001) . The results of multiple logistic regression analysis showed that controlling smoking (OR=0.578, 95%CI 0.378−0.884), controlling alcohol consumption (OR=0.662, 95%CI 0.444−0.987), improvement of exercise habits (OR=0.811, 95%CI 0.671−0.981), improvement of salt intake (OR=0.751, 95%CI 0.607−0.928), improvement of medication adherence (OR=0.275, 95%CI 0.219−0.345), and improvement of medical compliance behavior (OR=0.714, 95%CI 0.560−0.911) were protective factors for uncontrolled hypertensive patients to achieve blood pressure targets.
    Conclusion After the management of “Hypertension Center” mode, hypertensive patients can achieve better blood pressure control results, with lower costs and better health management levels.

     

/

返回文章
返回